|
|
The aim of the study was to determine the digestibility and N
retention in crossbred pigs fed water spinach or water spinach
mixed with mulberry leaves, as protein sources in basal diets of
cassava root meal (CR) plus rice bran (RB), or sugar palm syrup
(SP) plus broken rice (BR). Eight castrated male crossbred pigs
(Large White X Local breed) of average live weight 25 kg were used
in the experiment. The design was a 2*2 factorial within duplicated
4*4 Latin squares with 12 days per period, 7 days for adaptation
and 5 days for faeces and urine collection.
In the factorial analysis there were no significant interactions
between energy and protein (leaves) sources in any of the measured
traits. There were no differences due to source of energy for dry
matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) intakes (P>0.05), but crude
fibre (CF) intake was higher on the CRRB diet, reflecting the
presence of the rice bran, which had a higher crude fibre content
than all the other ingredients. Coefficients of apparent
digestibility of DM, CP and CF were higher for the SPBR diets. The
source of protein had no effect on either feed intake or apparent
digestibility coefficients (P>0.05). However, when 50% of the
water spinach was replaced by mulberry leaves, there were
differences in N balance traits, with reduced N excretion in urine
and higher N retention in absolute amounts and also in retained N
as percentages of N intake and N digested. It is concluded that
protein utilization efficiency is increased when the protein source
is a mixture of water spinach and mulberry leaves rather than only
water spinach.
In Cambodia, pigs are raised mainly to increase family income at village level and there are few commercial enterprises. The diets used by farmers have low digestibility and are low in protein and minerals, which results in low levels of performance. The need therefore is to identity feeds which can compensate for these deficiencies. Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) is a water and marsh plant with creeping, hollow, water-filled stems and shiny green leaves. It is cultivated for human food and used as pig and other animal feed in Cambodia and throughout Southeast Asia. It has been shown recently that water spinach grown on poor sandy soil responds dramatically to fertilization with the effluent from a biodigester charged with pig manure (Kean Sophea and Preston, 2001). Yields of up to 24 tonnes of fresh biomass/ha were achieved in a growth period of only 30 days from the time of sowing the seed. The fresh biomass contained 10% dry matter (DM) with a crude protein (CP) content of 22% in the DM. Other reports indicate that the fresh leaves and stems of water spinach have a CP content of between 20 and 31% in DM (Le Thi Men et al 2000; Bui Huy Nhu Phuc, 2000; Prak Kea et al 2003; Chhay Ty and Preston, 2005) and ash concentrations of around 12% of DM (Göhl, 1981; Bui Huy Nhu Phuc, 2000). Water spinach is readily eaten by pigs and is a locally available feed resource throughout the country. It has also been used successfully to replace part of the protein in a diet of sugar cane juice for breeding sows in Vietnam (Le Thi Men and Bui Hong Van, 1993). The limitations in the use of water spinach in pig diets are likely to be its voluminous nature and relatively low digestibility. According to Ly et al. (2002), in vitro digestibility of nitrogen is only 56%, compared with 75% in duckweed. The low energy density in water spinach can be corrected by supplementation or combination with energy-rich feeds, such as cassava root meal, rice bran, sugar palm syrup and broken rice.
Mulberry trees have been domesticated for many centuries for
feeding silkworms (Tingzing et al 1988) and there are reports of
their use in Cambodia for this purpose, but these activities have
been developed only on a small scale (Delvert, 1961). Mulberry
leaves have been fed successfully to sheep and goats in Vietnam,
and Vu Chi Cuong et al. (2005) showed that for cattle, fresh
mulberry leaves had the same protein value as cottonseed meal. Less
is known about the nutritive potential of mulberry leaves for pigs.
In a preliminary study in Cambodia (Chiv Phiny et al 2003), it
was found that pigs showed a slight preference for fresh versus
sun-dried leaves; however, a more interesting finding was that the
DM digestibility of the diet increased linearly
(R2=0.86) with increasing proportions of mulberry leaves
(range of 0 to 50% mulberry leaves in the diet DM). From these data
(Y = 0.131X + 75.9, where Y is % DM digestibility and X =
proportion (%) of mulberry leaves in the diet DM), it can be
predicted that with 100% mulberry leaves in the diet, the DM
digestibility would be 89%.
The bulky nature of vegetative protein sources such as mulberry leaves and water spinach could be a factor limiting their intake by pigs. Thus there are likely to be advantages if the energy source is low in fibre. For this reason the energy source in the diets used by Le Thi Men and Bui Hong Van, (1993) was reconstituted sugar cane juice, which contains no fibre. In Cambodia, the use of syrup from sugar palm (Borassus flabellifer) as the energy source for pigs could be an interesting possibility for the small-scale farmer. Encouraging results were reported with sugar palm syrup supplemented with soya bean meal (Khieu Borin et al 1996). However, there are no reports on the use of protein-rich leaves as the protein supplement in diets of palm syrup plus broken rice.
Cassava root meal is low in both fibre and in protein, making the economic utilization of the roots in animal feeds highly dependent on the incorporation of other protein-rich ingredients (Balagopalan et al 1988). According to Preston and Murgueitio (1992), the low protein content of most tropical feeds that could be used as basal diets in pig and poultry feeding requires that almost all the dietary needs for amino acids must be supplied as an addition to the basal diet. However, there are no reports on the use of cassava root meal plus rice bran with the protein-rich leaves as the protein supplement in pig diets.
The hypotheses to be tested were that apparent digestibility coefficients of DM, CP and CF, and efficiency of protein utilization, would be higher: (i) when the energy component of the diet was low in fibre; and (ii) protein utilization would be improved when the protein was derived from a mixture of mulberry leaves with water spinach rather than water spinach alone.
Comparisons of fibre level were made by comparing a mixture of cassava root meal plus rice bran with sugar palm juice and broken rice. The protein sources were fresh water spinach alone or combined 50:50 (DM basis) with fresh leaves of mulberry.
The experiment was carried out from November 15 to December 28, 2006, in the Ecological farm of the Center for Livestock and Agriculture Development, CelAgrid- Cambodia, located in Prah Theat village, Rolous Commune, Kandal Steung District, Kandal Province, near Phnom Penh City. The ambient temperature was about 35oC in the middle of the day.
Eight castrated male crossbred pigs (Large White X Local breed) of average live weight 25kg were allocated to a 2*2 factorial arrangement within a replicated 4*4 Latin square design (Table 1). The factors were:
Energy source: Cassava root meal plus rice bran or sugar palm syrup plus broken rice
Protein source: Water spinach or a 50:50 mixture of water spinach and mulberry leaves
The individual treatments were:
WCRRB: Water spinach with cassava root meal plus rice bran
WSPBR: Water spinach with sugar palm syrup plus broken rice
WMCRRB: Mixture of water spinach and mulberry leaves (50: 50 DM basis) with cassava root meal plus rice bran
WMSPBR: Mixture of water spinach and mulberry leaves (50: 50 DM basis) with sugar palm syrup plus broken rice
In each Latin square there were 4 periods each of 12 days, 7 days for adaptation and 5 days for faeces and urine collection.
|
Table 1. Experimental layout |
||||||||
|
Pigs |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
Period |
Square 1 |
Square 2 |
||||||
|
I |
WCRRB |
WSPBR |
WMSPBR |
WMCRRB |
WMSPBR |
WMCRRB |
WCRRB |
WSPBR |
|
II |
WMSPBR |
WMCRRB |
WCRRB |
WSPBR |
WMCRRB |
WCRRB |
WSPBR |
WMSPBR |
|
III |
WMCRRB |
WCRRB |
WSPBR |
WMSPBR |
WSPBR |
WMSPBR |
WMCRRB |
WCRRB |
|
IV |
WSPBR |
WMSPBR |
WMCRRB |
WCRRB |
WCRRB |
WSPBR |
WMSPBR |
WMCRRB |
The chemical composition of the dietary ingredients is shown in Table 2, and the ingredient and chemical composition of the experimental diets in Table 3.
|
Table 2. Chemical characteristics of the dietary ingredients |
||||
|
|
|
As % of DM |
||
|
Ingredient |
% DM |
CP |
CF |
Ash |
|
Cassava root meal |
87.5 |
2.50 |
6.88 |
2.38 |
|
Rice bran |
91.0 |
12.6 |
11.9 |
10.2 |
|
Sugar palm syrup |
81.9 |
0.24 |
nd |
nd |
|
Broken rice |
87.0 |
9.44 |
1.96 |
0.63 |
|
Water spinach |
9.10 |
25.7 |
22.8 |
16.2 |
|
Mulberry leaves |
31.3 |
22.1 |
16.0 |
22.2 |
|
Premix / salt |
98.0 |
nd |
nd |
nd |
|
nd= not determined |
||||
|
Table 3. Composition (planned) and chemical composition (calculated from analytical data) of the diets |
||||
|
|
WCRRB |
WSPBR |
WMCRRB |
WMSPBR |
|
Ingredients, % DM basis |
|
|
||
|
Cassava root meal |
35 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
|
Rice bran |
34 |
0 |
34 |
0 |
|
Sugar palm syrup |
0 |
31 |
0 |
28 |
|
Broken rice |
0 |
30 |
0 |
29 |
|
Water spinach |
30 |
38 |
16 |
21 |
|
Mulberry leaves |
0 |
0 |
16 |
21 |
|
Premix / salt |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Analysis, % |
|
|
|
|
|
DM |
65.5 |
55.9 |
67.2 |
57.6 |
|
As % of DM |
|
|
|
|
|
Ash |
9.14 |
6.33 |
10.4 |
8.24 |
|
Organic matter |
90.8 |
93.6 |
89.6 |
91.7 |
|
Crude fibre |
13.3 |
9.25 |
12.5 |
8.24 |
|
Crude protein (Nx6.25) |
12.9 |
12.7 |
12.8 |
12.8 |
Water spinach was purchased daily in the local market, but cassava root meal, rice bran, broken rice and sugar palm syrup were bought every week, also in the local market. Mulberry leaves were harvested in the CelAgrid ecological farm. Water spinach and mulberry leaves were chopped into 0.5-1cm pieces and mixed with cassava root meal plus rice bran or sugar palm syrup plus broken rice before feeding to the pigs. A premix of minerals, vitamins and salt was also added to the diets. The protein level was limited to 13% CP in the DM of all diets. The composition of these feeds (Table 2) is calculated from analytical data of the ingredients, which were analyzed in the CelAgrid laboratory. The proportions in each of the diets are shown in Table 3 (DM basis). All the ingredients were mixed together. The total amount fed was fixed at 80% of the ad libitum intake observed during the adaptation period. The pigs were fed three times per day, at 07.00, 12.00 and 16.00h.
The pigs were housed in metabolism cages made from rattan and bamboo strips fixed to a wooden frame in a composite unit (1.6 m length and 0.8 m wide) for 2 pigs per unit (Photo 1). The metabolism cages allowed the pigs to move freely. The cages were fitted with automatic water drinkers. The floor area of each metabolism cage was 80 x 80cm and was designed to make it possible to collect the faeces and urine separately. Plastic netting was suspended below the floor to collect the faeces. The urine passed through the plastic net and was collected over a sheet of polyethylene leading to a filter placed in a funnel suspended over a plastic bucket. A solution of 10% of H2SO4 was added to maintain the pH of the urine below 4 during the collection periods.
|
|
|
|
Faeces was collected and weighed every day, and then were kept frozen in plastic bags until analysis. At the end of each period, feed refusals and faeces were mixed thoroughly by hand and homogenized in a coffee grinder prior to analysis. Urine was collected in plastic buckets. At the end of each period the volume was measured and samples taken for analysis. The animals were weighed at the beginning of the trial and every 12 days.
Chemical analysis of the feed ingredients, diets and faeces were undertaken following the methods of Goering and Van Soest (1970) and Van Soest et al. (1991) for NDF and AOAC (1990) for Ash, N and crude fibre. The DM content was determined using the microwave method of Undersander et al. (1993). Fresh faeces were analyzed for pH with a glass electrode. The N content of urine was determined by AOAC (1990) procedures. All the analyses were done in duplicate. Amino acid analyses were carried out by AnalCen Nordic AB (Sweden) (Table 4).
|
Table 4. Major essential AA in the “ideal protein” and in leaves of mulberry and foliage of water spinach. |
|||
|
|
Ideal protein (1) |
Water spinach (2) |
Mulberry(2) |
|
g AA/kg N*6.25 |
|
||
|
Lysine |
|
42.7 |
50.6 |
|
Methionine |
13.5 |
16.5 |
|
|
Cystine |
|
10.3 |
12.0 |
|
Met+Cys |
|
23.8 |
28.6 |
|
Threonine |
|
39.5 |
45.1 |
|
As proportion of lysine = 100 |
|
||
|
Lysine |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
Met+Cys |
59 |
56 |
57 |
|
Threonine |
75 |
92 |
89 |
|
(1)Wang and Fuller 1989; (2) Analyses done on samples from the experiment by Commercial laboratory in Sweden |
|||
The data were analyzed using the general linear model option of Minitab ANOVA software (Minitab release 31.31, 2000). The model used was:
Yijkl= μ + Ei + Lj + Ei*Lj + Ak + Pl + eijkl
where Y = Dependent variable, μ = Overall mean, Ei = Energy effect, Lk = Leaves effect, Ei*Lj = Interaction Energy*Leaves, Ak = Animal effect, Pl = Period effect, eijkl = Random error
In the factorial analysis there were no significant interactions between energy and protein (leaves) sources in any of the measured traits. The results for feed intake, apparent digestibility and N balance are therefore presented as main effects (Table 5).
The pigs were in good health and gained in live weight during the trial. There were no symptoms or signals of discomfort from the consumption of the diets.
|
Table 5. Mean values for daily intake of dietary ingredients, total dry matter and crude protein in pigs fed cassava root meal plus rice bran [CRRB] or sugar palm syrup plus broken rice [SPBR] with water spinach [W] or water spinach mixed with mulberry leaves [WM] |
|||||
|
|
WCRRB |
WMCRRB |
WMSPBR |
WSPBR |
SEM |
|
Intake, g/day fresh material |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cassava root meal |
359 |
323 |
|
158 |
|
|
Rice bran |
335 |
320 |
|
153 |
|
|
Sugar palm syrup |
|
|
291 |
318 |
|
|
Broken rice |
|
|
299 |
349 |
|
|
Premix/salt |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
|
|
Water spinach |
2956 |
1506 |
2018 |
3846 |
|
|
Mulberry leaves |
|
438 |
587 |
|
|
|
Total DM, g/day |
912 |
865 |
936 |
882 |
35 |
|
Total CP, g/day |
136 |
129 |
143 |
138 |
5.3 |
There were no differences due to source of energy for DM and crude protein intakes, but crude fibre intake was higher on the CRRB diet (Table 6), reflecting the presence of the rice bran which had a higher crude fibre content than all the other ingredients (Table 6). The DM content of the faeces was lower for pigs fed the SPBR diet (Table 7) indicating a faster rate of passage of digesta. Coefficients of apparent digestibility of DM, crude protein and crude fibre were higher for the SPBR diets, probably because of the lower content of crude fibre (Table 8 and Figures 1 and 2).
|
Table 6. Mean values for main effects on feed intake: cassava root meal plus rice bran [CRRB] versus sugar palm syrup plus broken rice [SPBR]; and water spinach [W] versus water spinach mixed mulberry leaves [WM] |
|||||||
|
|
CRRB |
SPBR |
P-value |
W |
WM |
P-value |
SEM |
|
Feed intake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DM, g/day |
894 |
906 |
0.72 |
930 |
871 |
0.08 |
22.3 |
|
g DM/kg LW/day |
33.2 |
34.7 |
0.20 |
34.6 |
33.3 |
0.29 |
0.81 |
|
Crude protein, g/day |
133 |
141 |
0.19 |
141 |
132 |
0.12 |
3.46 |
|
Crude fibre, g/day |
118 |
83.8 |
0.001 |
106 |
95.2 |
0.02 |
3.07 |
|
Table 7. Mean values for main effects on faecal characteristics and weights of urine: cassava root meal plus rice bran [CRRB] versus sugar palm syrup plus broken rice [SPBR]; and water spinach [W] versus water spinach mixed with mulberry leaves [WM] |
|||||||
|
|
CRRB |
SPBR |
P-value |
W |
WM |
P-value |
SEM |
|
Faecal pH |
7.45 |
6.35 |
0.001 |
6.74 |
7.06 |
0.27 |
0.19 |
|
Faecal DM, % |
28.0 |
19.8 |
0.001 |
22.0 |
25.9 |
0.001 |
0.48 |
|
Urine weight, g |
2287 |
3180 |
0.02 |
3157 |
2310 |
0.03 |
245 |
|
Table 8. Mean values for main effects on apparent digestibility: cassava root meal plus rice bran [CRRB] versus sugar palm syrup plus broken rice [SPBR]; and water spinach [W] versus water spinach mixed mulberry leaves [WM] |
|||||||
|
|
CRRB |
SPBR |
P-value |
W |
WM |
P-value |
SEM |
|
Apparent digestibility, % |
|
|
|
||||
|
Dry matter |
72.6 |
83.9 |
0.001 |
78.7 |
77.8 |
0.52 |
0.94 |
|
Crude protein |
54.5 |
60.6 |
0.04 |
56.5 |
58.6 |
0.44 |
1.89 |
|
Organic matter |
72.2 |
77.7 |
0.003 |
75.6 |
74.3 |
0.40 |
1.08 |
|
Crude fibre |
44.4 |
75.5 |
0.001 |
64.3 |
55.6 |
0.17 |
4.21 |
|
|
|
|
Figure 1: Mean values for apparent digestibility of DM in pigs
fed cassava root meal plus rice bran [CRRB] or sugar palm syrup
plus broken rice [SBBR] with water spinach or water spinach +
mulberry leaves |
Figure 2 |